Johnson v. Bull's Eye

Case Status: Closed
Washington, Maryland, Virginia, District of Columbia · January 16, 2003

Victory in Holding Gun Sellers Accountable on Behalf of Victims and Families in DC Sniper Case


In 2002, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo killed 17 people and injured seven on a nine-month crime spree. This crime spree included three weeks of sniper shootings, which killed ten individuals in the Maryland, Washington D.C, and Virginia area, infamously known as the D.C. Sniper Attacks.

The snipers obtained their gun, a Bushmaster XM-15, from Bull’s Eye Shooter Supply, a gun store run in such a grossly negligent manner that guns routinely left the store without a record of the sale. Bull’s Eye claimed that it had no record of selling the snipers’ XM-15 when federal agents requested its sale documents


On January 16, 2003, Brady filed suit against the snipers, Bull’s Eye, and Bushmaster. The lawsuit alleged that the store was responsible for the shootings due to its grossly negligent sales practices, which allowed the shooters to acquire the weapon. The suit also alleged that Bushmaster was accountable for continuing to supply the store despite years of audits by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) that found egregious violations. Lastly, the suit claimed that the defendants created a public nuisance by distributing and selling guns in such a grossly negligent manner.

After the trial court held that the dealer and manufacturer could be held liable for the shootings, the parties agreed to a settlement in a pre-trial mediation session: Bull’s Eye would pay $2 million to the families, and Bushmaster would pay $568,000 out of its insurance policy. As part of the settlement, Bushmaster agreed to reform its distribution practices and stated that it supported laws requiring licensing and ATF monitoring for firearms dealers. ATF later revoked Bull’s Eye’s license to sell guns.

Back to Resources
Related Legal Cases

Englund v. J&G Sales & World Pawn Exchange

Landmark Victory Reforming the Online Gun Industry

FL Gag rule, Wollschlaeger v. Scott

Victory in Florida, Strikes Down Gag Law Restricting Doctors From Talking About Gun Risks

Brady Center v. ATF - FOIA Lawsuits

Victory Exposing ATF and Gun Industry

Delana v. Odessa Gun & Pawn

Victory in Missouri Supreme Court, Gun Dealer Liable for Sale of Murder Weapon

Mata v. Pioneer Pawn

Victory in Reforming Texas Gun Dealer

Shirley v. Glass

Victory in Kansas Supreme Court, Gun Dealer Liable for Sale of Murder Weapon

Wortham v. Ed's Pawn Shop

Victory on Behalf of Family of Chicago Police Officer Murdered After Straw Purchase

Jefferson v. Sauers

Victory in Philadelphia, Holding Gun Dealer Accountable and Settlement for Mother Whose Son Was Killed with Trafficked Gun

Allen v. Lock N Load

Victory in Reforming Florida Gun Dealer After Murder From Straw Purchase

McGuire and Lemongello v. Will's

Victory in Holding Gun Dealer Accountable and Landmark Settlement for Police Officers Shot with Trafficked Gun

Williams v. Beemiller

Victory in New York Appeals Court Against Gun Trafficking

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson

Victory in Indiana Supreme Court Holding Gun Industry Accountable for Negligent Sales

Daniel v. Armslist

Victory in Wisconsin Appeals Court Against Internet Gun Market

Prescott et al v. Slide Fire Solutions

Fighting Against Bump Stocks for Victims of the Las Vegas music shooting

Fox v. In Site Firearms

Fighting for a Police Officer Killed in Philadelphia With A Weapon From a Straw Sale

Runnels v. KS&E Sports

Fighting for a Police Officer Injured in Indiana With A Weapon From a Straw Sale

Luke v. A Pawn Shop

Global $2 Million Settlement with Gun Dealer that Conducted Deadly Straw Purchase