The gun lobby is fond of a particular view of American history, one where firearms reigned supreme (and unregulated). However, that view of America's past is deeply distorted, as Dr. Robert Spitzer details in his new book The Gun Dilemma: How History is Against Expanded Gun Rights.
Dr. Spitzer joined host JJ to detail the ways in which courts — especially the Supreme Court — have been using a mix of originalist theory and misunderstood history to rule on gun issues including but not limited to assault weapons, open carry, permit less carry, and the so-called Second Amendment sanctuary movement.
Want to get involved?
Urge your senators to expand and strengthen background checks.
Join a Brady chapter near you and sign up to attend our new volunteer session.
Further reading:
What Are So-Called “Second Amendment Sanctuaries?" (Brady)
US tragedies from guns have often – but not always – spurred political responses (the Conversation)
SUNY Cortland professor on why gun violence is on the rise (Spectrum News)
The Renegade Sheriffs (the New York Times)
Read More
-
141: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment
July 30, 2021 -
140: The Second Amendment in an Unequal America
July 23, 2021 -
103: Can You Police the Second Amendment?
November 25, 2020 -
102: What the Biden-Harris Administration Means for Gun Violence Prevention
November 23, 2020 -
28: You Have a Constitutional Right to Not Be Shot
December 4, 2019
Share:
Share 207: How History is Against Expanded Gun Rights on Facebook. Share 207: How History is Against Expanded Gun Rights on Bluesky. Share 207: How History is Against Expanded Gun Rights on Linkedin.