resources

Pittsburgh v. NRA

Case Status: Closed
Pennsylvania · April 1, 2009

“The Pittsburgh City Council passed an ordinance on December 2, 2008, that required gun owners to notify police when firearms were lost or stolen. Many cities have adopted such policies, which help deter trafficking by preventing criminals from claiming guns traced to them were lost or stolen, rather than sold on the black market. The law also helps police investigate thefts of weapons from law-abiding gun owners. In April 2009, the NRA and a group of its members sued the City, alleging that the reporting rule was moot because Pennsylvania has a law restricting local governments’ ability to regulate guns.

The Brady legal team represented Pittsburgh to defend the City’s rule. The defense in the case centered on the legal concept of standing: in general, in order to bring a suit of this type, the plaintiffs must first demonstrate that they are harmed as a result of the challenged law. However, the NRA and its members were never able to demonstrate harm from the rule sufficient to give them standing to bring the case.

Brady Center attorneys argued the City’s case in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on July 8, 2009, where Senior Judge R. Stanton Wettick dismissed the NRA’s claim due to lack of standing on July 21. The NRA appealed the ruling to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, one of the state’s appeals courts, where arguments were heard on April 20, 2010; the court ruled against the NRA on standing grounds on August 18, 2010.

Finally, the NRA filed a petition for review of the case with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on September 17, 2010; the Brady Center filed a brief opposing the petition on October 4. On June 15, 2011, the Supreme Court denied the NRA’s petition, and rejected a motion to reconsider the denial on December 15, concluding the case.”


Back to Resources
Related Legal Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Seeking Justice in Missouri For Eight-Year-Old Killed by Father

After a 10 year legal battle, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a mother could seek justice from gun dealer who sold a firearm to her husband, a convicted felon, to kill her eight-year-old son.

Shirley v. Glass

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Shooters in DC Sniper Case

Brady held a gun dealer accountable for supplying firearms to the shooters who killed 17 people and injured seven others in the DC sniper attacks.

Johnson v. Bull's Eye

Types of Gun Violence

Justice for Chicago Police Officer Killed with a Trafficked Gun

Brady holds gun dealers accountable for selling trafficked firearms to the criminal market which were later used to used shoot and kill a Chicago Police Officer while on duty.

Wortham v. Ed's Pawn Shop

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Manufacturer Held Accountable in Death of Seven-Year-Old

Brady sued a gun manufacturer for not including crucial safety features that would have prevented the death of a seven-year old boy.

Jefferson v. Sauers

Types of Gun Violence

Calling out Manufacturers Supplying Criminal Firearms in Gary

Indiana Supreme Court upholds City of Gary’s claims of unlawful marketing and negligent gun sales by various gun manufacturers for contributing to gun violence in Illinois.

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson

Types of Gun Violence

Online Gun Sellers Supply Firearms Used in Shooting Rampage

Brady filed suit in case where prohibited person with domestic violence restraining order went on a shooting rampage at his wife’s workplace with firearm obtained through ArmsList.

Daniel v. Armslist

Types of Gun Violence

Las Vegas: Uncovering the Truth About Bump Stocks

Lawsuit filed against Slide Fire Solutions, which invented bump stocks and claims its main purpose is to assist those with limited hand mobility, as its founder boasts of its mimicry of automatic gun fire.

Prescott et al v. Slide Fire Solutions

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief Challenges the Charleston Loophole

Following the devastating Charleston church shooting Brady filed an amicus brief before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to close a loophole that allowed the shooting to obtain the firearm used in the shooting.

Sanders v. US

Types of Gun Violence

Boston v. Smith & Wesson

In the early 2000s, Boston experienced a significant increase in violence perpetrated with firearms. Boston, with the help of Brady, began litigation against the gun industry to address this gun violence problem.

Types of Gun Violence

Cities Seek Accountability Throughout 90’s

In the late 1990s, lawsuits spearheaded by Brady on behalf of over 30 major cities nationwide exposed the role of the gun industry in supplying the criminal gun market and won several landmark court decisions

City Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Promotes Justice for Teen Killed by CBP

Brady filed an amicus brief to support the family of an unarmed fifteen-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a rogue CBP officer. The boy's parents are seeking to hold the officer who shot their son accountable and the Supreme Court will consider whether or not the courts can recognize their claim.

Hernandez v. Mesa