resources

Guns Save Lives v. Deerfield Park

Case Status: Active
Illinois · April 5, 2018

Summary

The village of Deerfield, IL passed a ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines. Two lawsuits have been filed challenging the ban. Brady joined Perkins Coie and Holland & Knight as co-counsel, defending the township against lawsuits brought in opposition to the implementation of the ban.

Facts

On April 2, 2018 the Deerfield Village Board of Trustees in Illinois unanimously approved a ban on specific assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, prohibiting their possession, sale, and manufacturing within the village. Following the passage of the assault weapon ban within the village, two lawsuits were filed challenging the ordinance.

The first lawsuit, filed by Deerfield resident Daniel Easterday just a few days after the ban was passed, is supported by the Illinois State Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation. The complaint alleges that the ordinance is preempted by Illinois state law as stated in the Illinois Firearm Owners Identification Card Act and the Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry Act.

The second lawsuit was filed by Guns Save Lives, Inc and Deerfield resident John Williman Wombacher III, and is supported by the National Rifle Association. This suit alleges that law violates a guarantee under the Illinois Constitution that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. It further challenges the definition of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Brady is defending the Deerfield’s ordinance in both suits.

Court History

In June of 2018, an Illinois judge implemented a temporary restraining order to prevent the enforcement of the ordinance, until the two lawsuits challenging the ban are heard. Attorneys returned to court on October, and oral arguments were heard before Lake County Circuit Court on January 18th, 2019. We are currently awaiting a decision, expected in mid-March.


Back to Resources
Related Legal Cases

Justice for Oregon Mother Fatally Shot with Online Gun

Brady won a major victory reforming the online gun industry and working to prevent future illegal sales after murder of mother of two.

Englund v. J&G Sales & World Pawn Exchange

Effects of Gun Violence

Gag Law Struck Down in Docs v Glocks

Victory in the 11th Circuit striking down an unconstitutional law preventing doctors from discussing health risks of gun ownership.

FL Gag rule, Wollschlaeger v. Scott

NRA Influence in ATF Policies Exposed

Seeking answers in court regarding ATF’s dangerous regulatory practices.

Brady v. ATF - FOIA Lawsuits

Negligent Missouri Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Man’s Death

Brady won a landmark victory against a negligent gun dealer in the Missouri Supreme Court, allowing the case to proceed to trial. The gun dealer settled for $2.2 million after negligently selling a gun to a woman with mental illness who used it to kill her father.

Delana v. Odessa Gun & Pawn

Texas Gun Dealer Agrees to Reform Business Practices

A texas gun dealer agreed to implement significant business reforms after it sold a gun to a dangerous purchaser who used the firearm to kill his father-in-law.

Mata v. Pioneer Pawn

Types of Gun Violence

Seeking Justice in Missouri For Eight-Year-Old Killed by Father

After a 10 year legal battle, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a mother could seek justice from gun dealer who sold a firearm to her husband, a convicted felon, to kill her eight-year-old son.

Shirley v. Glass

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Shooters in DC Sniper Case

Brady held a gun dealer accountable for supplying firearms to the shooters who killed 17 people and injured seven others in the DC sniper attacks.

Johnson v. Bull's Eye

Types of Gun Violence

Justice for Chicago Police Officer Killed with a Trafficked Gun

Brady holds gun dealers accountable for selling trafficked firearms to the criminal market which were later used to used shoot and kill a Chicago Police Officer while on duty.

Wortham v. Ed's Pawn Shop

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Manufacturer Held Accountable in Death of Seven-Year-Old

Brady sued a gun manufacturer for not including crucial safety features that would have prevented the death of a seven-year old boy.

Jefferson v. Sauers

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Man with Mental Illness

A gun dealer is no longer in business after Brady sued them for negligently selling a firearm to a man with mental illness who later shot and killed three people.

Allen v. Lock N Load

Justice for Officers Injured by Career Criminal

Brady facilitated a $1 million settlement between a firearms dealer and officers.

McGuire and Lemongello v. Will's

Fight Continues Against Gun Show Dealers For Supplying Gun Trafficker

Brady continues the fight for Daniel Williams, who suffered injuries in a drive-by shooting involving one of hundreds of firearms bought from negligent gun dealer Charles Brown. Courts found that gun dealers can be held liable under PLCAA for facilitating arms trafficking.

Williams v. Beemiller

Types of Gun Violence

Calling out Manufacturers Supplying Criminal Firearms in Gary

Indiana Supreme Court upholds City of Gary’s claims of unlawful marketing and negligent gun sales by various gun manufacturers for contributing to gun violence in Illinois.

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson

Types of Gun Violence

Online Gun Sellers Supply Firearms Used in Shooting Rampage

Brady filed suit in case where prohibited person with domestic violence restraining order went on a shooting rampage at his wife’s workplace with firearm obtained through ArmsList.

Daniel v. Armslist

Types of Gun Violence

Las Vegas: Uncovering the Truth About Bump Stocks

Lawsuit filed against Slide Fire Solutions, which invented bump stocks and claims its main purpose is to assist those with limited hand mobility, as its founder boasts of its mimicry of automatic gun fire.

Prescott et al v. Slide Fire Solutions

Straw Purchasers Accountable in Death of Pennsylvania Police Officer and US Marine

Brady filed suit and judge dismissed gun dealer’s preliminary objections, allowing case to push forward and hold dealers accountable when straw purchased firearms get distributed to prohibited persons while still on their property.

Fox v. In Site Firearms

Justice Won for Family of Officer Slain By Straw Purchased Gun

Indiana Supreme Court rules against gun dealer using state immunity law, giving victims ability to change business practices of gun dealers responsible for facilitating straw purchases.

Runnels v. KS&E Sports

Negligent Gun Dealer Forced to Close

Brady successfully settles for $2 million with Kansas Gun dealer, which was forced to close its doors for its extremely negligent business practices which resulted workplace shooting.

Luke v. A Pawn Shop

Victory for Cincinnati Against Gun Manufacturers

Ohio Supreme Court reverses lower court judgement dismissing claims of a municipality against a myriad of gun manufacturers for their distribution of firearms used in crimes within the city of Cincinnati.

City of Cincinnati v. Beretta

Straw Purchaser Kills Retired Couple

Fighting for couple killed with straw purchased gun

Miller v. Harp’s Food Stores

Fighting for Family of Man Killed with Antique Gun Sold to Felon

Seeking to holding Cabela’s accountable for selling an antique blackpowder firearm to a convicted felon, who used the weapon to murder his 21-year old neighbor.

Galliher v. Cabela’s

Holding Major Gun Dealer Accountable for Arming the Streets of Wilmington

A 19-year-old young mother was killed in a crossfire while walking in Wilmington by a gun sold to a trafficker through a straw purchase.

Summers v. Cabela’s

Police officers Wounded by Prohibited Purchaser Who Got Gun Anyway

A man exhibited dangerous warning signs when he was seeking to purchase a firearm. Despite these concerns, the gun dealer sold the firearm which was later used to shoot and injure two police officers.

Hardy v. Chester Arms

Seeking Justice for Victims of Sutherland Springs

Fighting to hold a major Texas gun dealer accountable for arming the mass shooter who killed 26 worshipers at the First Baptist Church.

Sutherland Springs

Major Gun Dealer Supplied Serial Killer with Firearms

Fighting to hold gun dealer accountable for selling firearms to a gun trafficker who armed a now convicted serial killer.

Coxie v. Academy Sports

Beretta Needs Design Change to Protect Against Family Fire

Brady succeeds in holding Beretta liable for its discreet loaded chamber indicator, prompting state legislation for more clearly marked chamber indicators to protect individuals from unintentional fire.

Dix v. Beretta

Landmark Precedent Set Requiring Safety Features

New Mexico Court of Appeals rules in favor of Brady and the family of Sean Smith, who was injured as a result of an unintentional discharge. The Court ruled that Bryco should have included safety features to ensure that users know if there is a bullet in the chamber.

Smith v. Bryco

Seeking Justice for Unintentional Shooting of 13-year-old

Brady is seeking to hold a gun manufacturer accountable for not including a reasonable safety feature that would have prevented the unintentional shooting of a 13-year old boy.

Gustafson v. Springfield Armory

First Suit in MA Against Online Gun Retailer

Brady puts a dent in the formerly Teflon-coated internet gun industry, filing a case on behalf of injured police officer.

Stokinger v. Armslist

Deerfield Park

Brady assist in defending the village of Deerfield ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines against challenge by a gun rights group.

SCOTUS Amicus Filed to Keep Firearms from Domestic Abusers

Brady filed an Amicus brief on behalf of the government extending the Gun Control’s Act of 1968’s prohibition on the possession of firearms to persons convicted of “a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.”

United States v. Hayes

SCOTUS Amicus Filed Defending Firearms Ban for Domestic Violence Misdemeanors

Filed an Amicus brief to uphold the ban on domestic abusers possession of firearms.

United States v. Castleman

Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court to protect victims of domestic violence

Filed another Amicus in support of the ban on the possession of firearms by domestic violence abusers.

Voisine v. United States

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief Challenges the Charleston Loophole

Following the devastating Charleston church shooting Brady filed an amicus brief before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to close a loophole that allowed the shooting to obtain the firearm used in the shooting.

Sanders v. US

Effects of Gun Violence

Court Decides Citizen Have Right Not to be Armed

Struck down an unconstitutional city ordinance that required every household to own a firearm.

Nelson, GA

Emerging Dangers

Fighting Unregulated Make-Your-Own-Guns

Holding the State Department accountable for their dangerous decision to allow the blueprints of 3-D guns to be uploaded to the internet.

Brady v. State Department

Government Inaction in Regulating Gun Industry Exposed

Uncovered government documents exposing a NRA influence and lack of oversight against the gun industry.

Turk Memo

Types of Gun Violence

Pittsburgh Police Fight to Trace Crime Guns

Brady assists the city of Pittsburgh in protecting its ordinance to ensure crime guns can be adequately traced and that police can investigate firearms stolen from law-abiding gun owners.

Pittsburgh v. NRA

Types of Gun Violence

Boston v. Smith & Wesson

In the early 2000s, Boston experienced a significant increase in violence perpetrated with firearms. Boston, with the help of Brady, began litigation against the gun industry to address this gun violence problem.

Landmark Settlement with Smith & Wesson and Clinton Administration

Landmark settlement between major gun manufacturer, paved by litigation.

Smith & Wesson Settlement

Types of Gun Violence

Cities Seek Accountability Throughout 90’s

In the late 1990s, lawsuits spearheaded by Brady on behalf of over 30 major cities nationwide exposed the role of the gun industry in supplying the criminal gun market and won several landmark court decisions

City Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Promotes Justice for Teen Killed by CBP

Brady filed an amicus brief to support the family of an unarmed fifteen-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a rogue CBP officer. The boy's parents are seeking to hold the officer who shot their son accountable and the Supreme Court will consider whether or not the courts can recognize their claim.

Hernandez v. Mesa