Do You Have 5 Seconds to Help End Gun Violence?

Please vote for Brady to win funding from CREDO Mobile. The more votes we get, the more money Brady receives!

Vote Now!
resources

Daniel v. Armslist

Case Status: On Appeal
Wisconsin · October 24, 2015

Summary

An Internet gun marketplace enabled a man prohibited from purchasing a firearm due to his history of domestic violence to obtain a handgun through a private seller. The day after the handgun was purchased it was used to murder his wife, two others, and injure four people. Brady sued Armslist for negligently creating an online platform for prohibited purchasers to illegally obtain firearms.

Facts

Armslist.com, the largest private online firearms marketplace, facilitated the sale of a semi-automatic handgun through a private seller to a violent domestic violence abuser, who was prohibited from acquiring a firearm.

Zina Daniel Haughton was a victim of her husband’s domestic abuse for 10 years. In 2012 she asked the court to issue a restraining order against her husband, Radcliffe Haughton. The Wisconsin court granted her request for a restraining order and prohibited her husband from purchasing a firearm, as he was a clear threat to her safety. Despite this fact, Radcliffe Haughton was able to search for handguns on Armslist.com, contact a buyer he found there, and purchase a semi-automatic handgun. With this handgun, the next day, on October 21, 2012 Radcliffe Haughton, walked into his wife’s workplace, Azana Spa and Salon, and murdered his wife and two of her co-workers, as well as injuring four others.

The tragedy at the Azana Spa and Salon occurred because Armslist.com provided a platform to facilitate the illegal transfer of firearms to criminals and prohibited purchasers. Guns sold through Armslist have been tied to several other previous crimes, including at least one other murder. The complaint alleges that Armslist entered the online gun business after CraigsList, Amazon and other websites stopped allowing guns sales because they were concerned that prohibited people would obtain them, and that Armslist.com facilitated and enabled the sale of firearms to dangerous and prohibited purchasers through its website.

Court History

On behalf of Zina Daniel Haughton’s daughter, Yasmeen Daniel, Brady filed suit with Manatt, Phelps, & Phillips, LLP, and local counsel Cannon & Dunphy against Armslist, alleging that the website negligently enabled the sale of the handgun to Radcliffe Haughton, a prohibited purchaser, resulting in the multiple lives lost at the Azana Spa and Salon. In the fight to hold Armslist accountable, Brady won a landmark victory in April of 2018 when the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin held that Armslist can be held liable for negligently facilitating illegal gun purchases through it’s website. This decision sets an important precedent for private online gun sales.

Armslist appealed the Court of Appeals decision and the case is now before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Oral Arguments were heard on February 14, 2019, and we are awaiting a decision.


Back to Litigation
Related Legal Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Seeking Justice in Missouri For Eight-Year-Old Killed by Father

After a 10 year legal battle, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a mother could seek justice from gun dealer who sold a firearm to her husband, a convicted felon, to kill her eight-year-old son.

Shirley v. Glass

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Dealer Held Accountable for Arming Shooters in DC Sniper Case

Brady held a gun dealer accountable for supplying firearms to the shooters who killed 17 people and injured seven others in the DC sniper attacks.

Johnson v. Bull's Eye

Types of Gun Violence

Justice for Chicago Police Officer Killed with a Trafficked Gun

Brady holds gun dealers accountable for selling trafficked firearms to the criminal market which were later used to used shoot and kill a Chicago Police Officer while on duty.

Wortham v. Ed's Pawn Shop

Types of Gun Violence

Gun Manufacturer Held Accountable in Death of Seven-Year-Old

Brady sued a gun manufacturer for not including crucial safety features that would have prevented the death of a seven-year old boy.

Jefferson v. Sauers

Types of Gun Violence

Calling out Manufacturers Supplying Criminal Firearms in Gary

Indiana Supreme Court upholds City of Gary’s claims of unlawful marketing and negligent gun sales by various gun manufacturers for contributing to gun violence in Illinois.

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson

Types of Gun Violence

Las Vegas: Uncovering the Truth About Bump Stocks

Lawsuit filed against Slide Fire Solutions, which invented bump stocks and claims its main purpose is to assist those with limited hand mobility, as its founder boasts of its mimicry of automatic gun fire.

Prescott et al v. Slide Fire Solutions

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief Challenges the Charleston Loophole

Following the devastating Charleston church shooting Brady filed an amicus brief before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to close a loophole that allowed the shooting to obtain the firearm used in the shooting.

Sanders v. US

Types of Gun Violence

Pittsburgh Police Fight to Trace Crime Guns

Brady assists the city of Pittsburgh in protecting its ordinance to ensure crime guns can be adequately traced and that police can investigate firearms stolen from law-abiding gun owners.

Pittsburgh v. NRA

Types of Gun Violence

Boston v. Smith & Wesson

In the early 2000s, Boston experienced a significant increase in violence perpetrated with firearms. Boston, with the help of Brady, began litigation against the gun industry to address this gun violence problem.

Types of Gun Violence

Cities Seek Accountability Throughout 90’s

In the late 1990s, lawsuits spearheaded by Brady on behalf of over 30 major cities nationwide exposed the role of the gun industry in supplying the criminal gun market and won several landmark court decisions

City Cases

Types of Gun Violence

Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Promotes Justice for Teen Killed by CBP

Brady filed an amicus brief to support the family of an unarmed fifteen-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a rogue CBP officer. The boy's parents are seeking to hold the officer who shot their son accountable and the Supreme Court will consider whether or not the courts can recognize their claim.

Hernandez v. Mesa